مروری بر نقش تلفیق حسابداری آب با رویکرد تفکر نظام‌مند در تقویت حکمرانی پایدار منابع آب

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، حسابداری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اراک، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه حسابداری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اراک، ایران

چکیده

مدیریت پایدار منابع آب مستلزم به‌کارگیری رویکردهایی جامع و میان‌رشته‌ای است که بتوانند ابعاد اقتصادی، اجتماعی و زیست‌محیطی را به‌صورت یکپارچه تحلیل کنند. در این راستا، تلفیق حسابداری آب و تفکر نظام‌مند به‌عنوان یک رویکرد نوین، امکان درک پویایی‌های پیچیده نظام‌های انسان–آب را فراهم می‌سازد. هدف این پژوهش، شناسایی و تحلیل نقش این تلفیق در تقویت حکمرانی پایدار منابع آب است. روش تحقیق بر پایه مرور نظام‌مند مطالعات منتشرشده طی دو دهه اخیر در پایگاه‌های معتبر علمی و تحلیل محتوای یافته‌های آن‌ها انجام شده است. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که حسابداری آب با ارائه داده‌های دقیق درباره جریان‌ها و مصارف منابع آبی، زیرساخت اطلاعاتی لازم برای الگو‌سازی‌های نظام‌مند را فراهم می‌کند و تفکر نظام‌مند با تحلیل روابط علی، بازخوردها و تأخیرهای زمانی، به تصمیم‌گیری تطبیقی و بلندمدت کمک می‌نماید. تلفیق این دو رویکرد موجب ارتقای شفافیت، پاسخگویی نهادی، هماهنگی میان‌بخشی و کارایی سیاست‌های تخصیص آب می‌شود. همچنین، این رویکرد از طریق طراحی سناریوهای پویا، امکان ارزیابی پیامدهای اجتماعی و زیست‌محیطی تصمیمات را فراهم می‌سازد. باوجوداین، چالش‌هایی نظیر کمبود داده‌های دقیق، فقدان استانداردسازی شاخص‌ها و ضعف همکاری میان‌رشته‌ای از موانع اصلی اجرای عملی این تلفیق هستند. درنهایت، نتایج پژوهش تأکید می‌کند که توسعه چارچوب‌های بومی مبتنی بر حسابداری آب و تفکر نظام‌مند می‌تواند مسیر دستیابی به حکمرانی پایدار و تاب‌آور منابع آب در ایران را هموار سازد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Systematic Review of the Role of Integrating Water Accounting and Systems Thinking in Strengthening Sustainable Water Resources Governance

نویسندگان [English]

  • Donya Solouki 1
  • ali lalbar 2
1 M.A. Student in Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Accounting Ar,c, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran
چکیده [English]

Abstract
Introduction
Human societies face increasing water-related challenges, including severe droughts, sudden floods, groundwater depletion, land subsidence, and environmental degradation (Mashir Panahi et al., 2020). These issues are exacerbated by climate change, rapid population growth, and unsustainable water consumption patterns. Traditional water management approaches often focus on sectoral interventions and overlook systemic feedback loops that reinforce water-related problems, leading to policy failures (Gohari et al., 2022). Achieving sustainable water resources management requires integrated, interdisciplinary frameworks that consider the complex interactions between human and hydrological systems and ensure stakeholder participation in decision-making.
Objective
This study aims to systematically review and analyze the role of integrating water accounting and systems thinking in enhancing sustainable water resources governance. Specifically, it investigates how this integration improves transparency, institutional accountability, intersectoral coordination, and policy effectiveness in water allocation and management.
Research Method
The research employs a systematic review methodology, analyzing studies published over the past two decades in reputable scientific databases. Content analysis of these studies focused on water accounting applications, systems thinking frameworks, dynamic system modeling, and integrated governance approaches.
Results and Discussion
The findings indicate that water accounting provides structured quantitative data on water flows, stocks, consumption, and economic value across sectors, forming the informational basis for system modeling (Tellow et al., 2016). Systems thinking complements this by analyzing causal relationships, feedback loops, and time delays, thereby facilitating adaptive and long-term decision-making (Zamroodian et al., 2018). Integrated approaches enhance transparency, stakeholder participation, institutional accountability, and the efficiency of water policies. International case studies from Australia, Spain, and the Netherlands demonstrate that such integration enables scenario-based evaluation of social and environmental impacts, identifies leverage points, and supports evidence-based, adaptive governance (Wang et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2025). However, challenges remain, including limited high-quality data, a lack of standardized indicators, differences in temporal and spatial scales, and weak interdisciplinary collaboration.
Conclusion
Integrating water accounting and systems thinking provides a comprehensive framework for understanding and managing human–water systems. This approach enables evidence-based, long-term, and adaptive policymaking, improves transparency and accountability, and enhances institutional coordination. For future research and practice, developing localized models, standardizing key indicators, leveraging emerging technologies such as remote sensing and AI, and strengthening multilevel governance frameworks are recommended to achieve resilient and sustainable water resources management in Iran and similar contexts.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: Water Accounting
  • Systems Thinking
  • Water Resources Sustainability
  • Water Governance

 

منابع
 معصومی بیلندی، زهرا؛ حجازی رضوان. (1398). حسابداری مدیریت آب. نشریه آب و توسعه پایدار، 14(7).
نمازی، محمد، مصلی‌نژاد، آرزو. (1400). طراحی الگوی حسابداری مدیریت یکپارچه آب با استفاده از الگوی ارزیابی متوازن. مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی، 14(7)
 
References
Bagstad, K.J., Ingram, J.C., Shapiro, C.D., La Notte, A., Maes, J., Vallecillo, S., Casey, C. F., Glynn, P.D., Heris, M.P., Johnson, J.A., Lauer, C. (2021). Lessons learned from development of natural capital accounts in the United States and European Union. Ecosystem Services, 52(C). DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101429
Bertule, M., Glennie, P., Koefoed Bjørnsen, P., James Lloyd, G., Kjellen, M., Dalton, J., ... & Harlin, J. (2018). Monitoring water resources governance progress globally: Experiences from monitoring SDG indicator 6.5. 1 on integrated water resources management implementation. Water, 10(12), 1744.
Bhuyan, M. J., & Deka, N. (2024). Understanding human-water nexus in a floodplain district of the Brahmaputra Valley, India: An integration of socio-hydrological and rural hydrological approaches. Science of The Total Environment, 906, 167525.
Gohari, A., Savari, P., Eslamian, S., Etemadi, N., & Keilmann-Gondhalekar, D. (2022). Developing a system dynamic plus framework for water-land-society nexus modeling within urban socio-hydrologic systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 185, 122092.
Jarzebski, M. P., Karthe, D., Chapagain, S. K., Setiawati, M. D., Wadumestrige Dona, C. G., Pu, J., & Fukushi, K. (2024). Comparative analysis of water sustainability indices: A systematic review. Water, 16(7), 961.
Levy, M. C., Garcia, M., Blair, P., Chen, X., Gomes, S. L., Gower, D. B., Grames, J., Kuil, L., Liu, Y., Marston, L., & McCord, P. F. (2016). Wicked but worth it: Student perspectives on socio-hydrology. Hydrological Processes, 30(9), 1467–1472.
Masoumi Bilandi, Z., & Hejazi, R. (2019). Water Management Accounting. Water and Sustainable Development Journal, 14(7). [In Persian]
Moshir Panahi, D., Kalantari, Z., Ghajarnia, N., Seifollahi-Aghmiuni, S., & Destouni, G. (2020). Variability and change in the hydro-climate and water resources of Iran over a recent 30-year period. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 7450.
Naeem, K., Zghibi, A., Elomri, A., Mazzoni, A., & Triki, C. (2023). A literature review on system dynamics modeling for sustainable management of water supply and demand. Sustainability, 15(8), 6826.
Namazi, M., & Mosallinejad, A. (2021). Designing an Integrated Water Management Accounting Model Using the Balanced Scorecard Approach. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 14(7) [In Persian]
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, O. F. E. C. A. D. (2018). Implementing the OECD principles on water governance: indicator framework and evolving practices (pp. 148-pp).
Phan, T. D., Bertone, E., & Stewart, R. A. (2021). Critical review of system dynamics modelling applications for water resources planning and management. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 2, 100031.
Polaine, X. K., Dawson, R., Walsh, C. L., Amezaga, J., Peña-Varón, M., Lee, C., & Rao, S. (2022). Systems thinking for water security. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 39(3), 205-223.
Sheikhbabaei, A., Hosseini Baghanam, A., Zarghami, M., Pouri, S., & Hassanzadeh, E. (2022). System thinking approach toward reclamation of regional water management under changing climate conditions. Sustainability, 14(15), 9411.
Simonovic, S. P. (2020). Systems approach to management of water resources—Toward performance based water resources engineering. Water, 12(4), 1208.
Tello, E., Hazelton, J., & Cummings, L. (2016). Potential users’ perceptions of general purpose water accounting reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(1), 80–110.
Vardon, M. J., Le, T. H. L., Martinez-Lagunes, R., Pule, O. B., Schenau, S., May, S., & Grafton, R. Q. (2023). Water accounts and water accounting. Global Commission on the Economics of Water: Paris, France.
Wan Rosely, W. I. H., & Voulvoulis, N. (2024). System thinking for sustainable water management: The use of system tools in sustainability transitions. Water Resources Management, 38(4), 1315-1337.
Wan Rosely, W. I. H., & Voulvoulis, N. (2024). System thinking for sustainable water management: The use of system tools in sustainability transitions. Water Resources Management, 38(4), 1315-1337.
Wang, X., Dong, Z., & Sušnik, J. (2023). System dynamics modelling to simulate regional water-energy-food nexus combined with the society-economy-environment system in Hunan Province, China. Science of The Total Environment, 863, 160993.
Yu, Y., Song, X., Zhang, Y., & Zheng, F. (2020). Assessment of water quality using chemometrics and multivariate statistics: a case study in chaobai river replenished by reclaimed water, North China. Water, 12(9), 2551.
Zhang, D., Liu, B., Liu, P., & Wang, Z. (2025). Accounting and system dynamics simulation of water resource liabilities in the Yangtze River Economic Zone, China. Evaluation and Program Planning, 111, 102586.
Zomorodian, M., Lai, S. H., Homayounfar, M., Ibrahim, S., Fatemi, S. E., & El-Shafie, A. (2018). The state-of-the-art system dynamics application in integrated water resources modeling. Journal of Environmental Management, 227, 294–303
(United Nations. (2012). System of Environmental-Economic Accounting for Water (SEEA-Water). New York: United Nations Statistics Division)